Unexpected and Unreasonable delays in processing of Informational RFC (E
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Unexpected and Unreasonable delays in processing of Informational RFC (ESRO Protocol)
- To: rfc-editor@isi.edu, rfc-ed@isi.edu, Jon Postel <postel@isi.edu>
- Subject: Unexpected and Unreasonable delays in processing of Informational RFC (ESRO Protocol)
- From: Mohsen Banan <mohsen@neda.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jul 1997 23:58:46 -0700 (PDT)
- CC: "Mark S. Taylor" <mtaylor@teledesic.com>, Jia-Bing Cheng <JBCheng@attws-hq1.nwest.attws.com>, Pean Lim-Neda <pean@neda.com>, Mohsen Banan-neda <mohsen@neda.com>
- Content-Length: -1044
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
More than 6 month ago we submitted the ESRO protcol for publication as an Informational RFC. It has not been published yet. Our requests to find out what the reason for the delays are, remain unanswered. This is unreasonable! We expect to see the ESRO protocol published as an Informational RFC as soon as possible. More than 6 months ago (on 1/11/97) Mark Taylor (then of AT&T) submitted the ESRO protocol for publication as an Informational RFC. (Message-Id: <32D7FFCA@wddmssmtp.nwest.airdata.com>) Shortly after that (on 1/15/97) I incorporated IANA's port assignment for the ESRO protocol and resubmitted it to the RFC-Editor. (Message-Id: <199701160714.XAA29795@jamshid.neda.com>) On January 23rd, the RFC editor acknowledged receipt and placed it in the publication queue and forwarded it to the IETF for their review. (Message-Id: <199701231743.AA10376@zen.isi.edu>) The ESRO protocol was put in the internet drafts directory on January 29th. (Message-Id: <9701300942.aa02647@ietf.org>) On March 31st I checked on the current status of this RFC and expressed our desire to see it published soon. (<199704010128.RAA26066@jamshid.neda.com>) On April 3th we were told that The IESG had requested that the ESRO document not be published at this time and that they would be in contact with us after their meeting that coming week in Memphis. (Message-Id: <199704032357.AA17887@zephyr.isi.edu>) I immediately replied requesting an explanation of this delay and the name of the relevant IESG contact person. I again offered to discuss and respond to questions/comments regarding the ESRO protocol. (Message-Id: <199704040100.RAA07041@jamshid.neda.com>) The above mentioned 7 messages are attached to the end of this message. Since April 3rd, we have not heard back from the RFC-Editor or the IESG regarding this Informational RFC. The Informational designation is intended to provide for timely publication. That is one of the reasons why we submitted ESRO with Informational designation. Considering that there has been adequate time (nearly 6 months) for the RFC Editor, the IESG, the IETF and the technical Internet community at large to review and comment on this document and that there has been no comments, again I request that the document be promptly published as an Informational RFC. It is my understanding that it is the responsibility of the RFC Editor to over see publication of Informational RFC according to the process described in BCP-9/RFC-2026 in a timely manner. It is unreasonable and unprofessional for IESG (or anybody else) to delay publication of an Informational RFC without providing any reason or explanation. I don't understand the reason for the RFC Editor and the IESG's failure of following the process defined for publication of Informational RFCs in the case of this document. We have done a significant amount of work on the specification and implementation of this useful protocol. We want to make it easy for others who wish to implement this protocol to access this document. Publication of this document as an Informational RFC accomplishes that. To the best of our knowledge there is nothing in the document that proposes something that conflicts with, or is actually inimical to, an established IETF effort. In short, this document has been in the queue for publication long enough. There has been ample time for through reviews. Since there has been no comments, I insist that RFC Editor publish it as an Informational RFC without any further delay. Regards, -- Mohsen Banan Neda Communications, Inc. tel: +1-206-644-8026 17005 S.E. 31st Place fax: +1-206-562-9591 Bellevue, Wa 98008 E-Mail: mohsen@neda.com U.S.A. URL: http://www.neda.com/ ------- start of digest (7 messages) (RFC 934 encapsulation) ------- From: Mark Taylor <mtaylor@airdata.com> To: rfc editor <rfc-editor@isi.edu> Cc: JiaBing Cheng <jcheng@airdata.com>, "Jim Grams (Corporate)" <jim.grams@mccaw.com>, mst <mark.taylor@airdata.com>, "'Mohsen Banan (Neda)'" <mohsen@rostam.neda.com>, "'Murat Divringi (Neda)'" <muratd@rostam.neda.com> Subject: Informational RFC Submission Request -- ESRO Protocol Date: Sat, 11 Jan 97 13:00:00 PST Message-Id: <32D7FFCA@wddmssmtp.nwest.airdata.com> Please accept this informational RFC for Efficient Short Remote Operations (ESRO), a protocol we have developed over the past two years. In this context, "we" refers to AT&T Wireless Services, Inc., and Neda Communications, Inc. (under contract to AT&T). I am the Director of Strategic Engineering in the Wireless Data Division of AT&T Wireless Services. The purpose of the ESRO protocol is to better support applications such as Email over low-bandwidth media, such as Cellular Digital Packet Data or other wireless services. The editor for this informational RFC is Mohsen Banan, of Neda Communications (who can be reached at mohsen@neda.com). We have requested a port number assignment from IANA for this protocol on January 9, 1997; the RFC editor was sent a copy of this request. Following the assignment of a port number, section 4.6.3 will require a corresponding modification. Mr. Banan can provide a LaTeX-revisable version of this RFC. Please direct all future correspondence regarding this RFC to Mr. Banan at mohsen@neda.com with a courtesy copy to Mr. Jia-bing Cheng of AT&T at jcheng@airdata.com. Thank-you in advance for your assistance in the publication of this RFC. Regards, Mark Taylor Director of Strategic Engineering AT&T Wireless Services 10230 NE Points Dr. Kirkland, WA 98033 mark.taylor@airdata.com ------The RFC is a text file attached below ------- [[ ESROS.TXT : 3408 in ESROS.TXT ]] The following binary file has been uuencoded to ensure successful transmission. Use UUDECODE to extract. begin 600 ESROS.TXT ... end ------------------------------ From: Mohsen Banan <mohsen@rostam.neda.com> To: rfc-editor@isi.edu Cc: JiaBing Cheng <jcheng@airdata.com>, jim.grams@airdata.com, "Mark S. Taylor" <mark.taylor@airdata.com>, Murat Divringi-neda <muratd@rostam.neda.com>, Mohsen Banan-neda <mohsen@rostam.neda.com> Subject: Update: Informational RFC Submission Request -- ESRO Protocol Date: Wed, 15 Jan 1997 23:14:42 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199701160714.XAA29795@jamshid.neda.com> Following through with Mark Taylor's email of January 11, 97, I have incorporated IANA's port assignment for the ESRO protocol in section 4.6.3. I have also made other minor editorial changes to other sections. The attached updated Informational RFC is now ready for your review and publication. If you want to also have the LaTeX revisable form of this RFC, please drop me -- Mohsen Banan <mohsen@neda.com> -- a note. Let me know if you have any questions or if you want us to modify the document in any specific way. Thank you in advance. ...Mohsen. - --- Network Working Group M. Banan, Neda Request for Comments: 2XXX M. Taylor, AWS Category: Informational J. Cheng, AWS January 1997 AT&T/Neda's Efficient Short Remote Operations (ESRO) Protocol Specification Version 1.2 Status of this Memo: This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. Abstract: This document specifies the service model, the notation and protocol for Efficient Short Remote Operations (ESRO). The ESRO service is similar to and is consistent with other Remote Procedure Call services. The emphasis of ESRO service definition and the ESRO protocol is on efficiency. ESRO is designed specifically with wireless network (e.g., CDPD) usage in mind. ESRO protocol provides reliable connectionless remote operation ............ Banan, et. al. Informational [Page 56] ------------------------------ From: rfc-ed@ISI.EDU To: mohsen@rostam.neda.com Cc: jcheng@airdata.com, jim.grams@airdata.com, mark.taylor@airdata.com, muratd@rostam.neda.com, rfc-editor@ISI.EDU Subject: Re: Update: Informational RFC Submission Request -- ESRO Protocol Date: Thu, 23 Jan 1997 09:43:49 -0800 Message-Id: <199701231743.AA10376@zen.isi.edu> Mohsen- We have received your RFC-to-be and have placed it in the publication queue. We have forwarded it to the IETF for their review. Sincerely, Mary Kennedy - USC/ISI Request for Comments Documents ------------------------------ From: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org Sender: ietf-announce-request@ietf.org To: IETF-Announce: ; Subject: I-D ACTION:draft-rfced-info-banan-esro-00.txt Date: Thu, 30 Jan 1997 09:42:10 -0500 Message-Id: <9701300942.aa02647@ietf.org> - --NextPart A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. Title : AT&T/Neda's Efficient Short Remote Operations (ESRO) Protocol Specification Version 1.2 Author(s) : M. Banan, M. Taylor, J. Cheng Filename : draft-rfced-info-banan-esro-00.txt Pages : 47 Date : 01/29/1997 This document specifies the service model, the notation and protocol for Efficient Short Remote Operations (ESRO). The ESRO service is similar to and is consistent with other Remote Procedure Call services. The emphasis of ESRO service definition and the ESRO protocol is on efficiency. ESRO is designed specifically with wireless network (e.g., CDPD) usage in mind. ESRO protocol provides reliable connectionless remote operation services on top of UDP (or any other non-reliable connectionless transport service) with minimum overhead. ESRO protocol supports segmentation and reassembly, concatenation and separation as well as multiplexing for service users (applications). ESRO allows for trade-offs between efficiency and reliability by specifying both 2-way hand-shake and 3-way hand-shake based protocols. Encoding mechanisms for presentation of the parameters of remote operations are outside the scope of this document. But, identification (tagging) of the encoding mechanism in use (e.g., XDR, BER, PER) is supported by ESRO protocol. A variety of applications can use the ESRO protocol. Some early applications using ESRO include efficient short message submission and delivery, credit card authorization and white pages lookup. Internet-Drafts are available by anonymous FTP. Login with the username "anonymous" and a password of your e-mail address. After logging in, type "cd internet-drafts" and then "get draft-rfced-info-banan-esro-00.txt". A URL for the Internet-Draft is: ftp://ds.internic.net/internet-drafts/draft-rfced-info-banan-esro-00.txt Internet-Drafts directories are located at: o Africa: ftp.is.co.za o Europe: ftp.nordu.net ftp.nis.garr.it o Pacific Rim: munnari.oz.au o US East Coast: ds.internic.net o US West Coast: ftp.isi.edu Internet-Drafts are also available by mail. Send a message to: mailserv@ds.internic.net. In the body type: "FILE /internet-drafts/draft-rfced-info-banan-esro-00.txt". NOTE: The mail server at ds.internic.net can return the document in MIME-encoded form by using the "mpack" utility. To use this feature, insert the command "ENCODING mime" before the "FILE" command. To decode the response(s), you will need "munpack" or a MIME-compliant mail reader. Different MIME-compliant mail readers exhibit different behavior, especially when dealing with "multipart" MIME messages (i.e., documents which have been split up into multiple messages), so check your local documentation on how to manipulate these messages. Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the Internet-Draft. - --NextPart Content-Type: Multipart/Alternative; Boundary="OtherAccess" - --OtherAccess Content-Type: Message/External-body; access-type="mail-server"; server="mailserv@ds.internic.net" Content-Type: text/plain Content-ID: <19970129105127.I-D@ietf.org> ENCODING mime FILE /internet-drafts/draft-rfced-info-banan-esro-00.txt - --OtherAccess Content-Type: Message/External-body; name="draft-rfced-info-banan-esro-00.txt"; site="ds.internic.net"; access-type="anon-ftp"; directory="internet-drafts" Content-Type: text/plain Content-ID: <19970129105127.I-D@ietf.org> - --OtherAccess-- - --NextPart-- ------------------------------ From: Mohsen Banan <mohsen@rostam.neda.com> To: rfc-ed@ISI.EDU Cc: mohsen@rostam.neda.com, jcheng@airdata.com, Jia-Bing Cheng <JBCheng@attws-hq1.nwest.attws.com>, rfc-editor@ISI.EDU Subject: Status of publication of ESRO Protocol as an Informational RFC Date: Mon, 31 Mar 1997 17:28:47 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199704010128.RAA26066@jamshid.neda.com> >>>>> On Thu, 23 Jan 1997 09:43:49 -0800, rfc-ed@ISI.EDU said: rfc-ed> Mohsen- rfc-ed> We have received your RFC-to-be and have placed it in the publication rfc-ed> queue. We have forwarded it to the IETF for their review. rfc-ed> Sincerely, rfc-ed> Mary Kennedy - USC/ISI rfc-ed> Request for Comments Documents Can you please let us know what the status of publication of ESRO Protocol as an Informational RFC is? When do you expect to publish it as an RFC? The initial Submission of this RFC was January 11, 1997. It was made available in the on-line Internet-Drafts directories on Jan 29, 97. Title : AT&T/Neda's Efficient Short Remote Operations (ESRO) Protocol Specification Version 1.2 Author(s) : M. Banan, M. Taylor, J. Cheng Filename : draft-rfced-info-banan-esro-00.txt Pages : 47 Date : 01/29/1997 We have received no feed-back on it since (neither from IETF, nor from the RFC Editor, nor from anybody else). My understanding of the publication process based on BCP-9/RFC-2029 "The Internet Standards Process -- Revision 3" Section 4.2.3 is that: "... The RFC Editor will wait two weeks after this publication [in the I-D directory] for comments before proceeding further. ...." draft-rfced-info-banan-esro-00.txt has been in the I-D directory for more then 2 months now. The Informational designation is intended to provide for timely publication. That is one of the reasons why we submitted ESRO with Informational designation. We would like to refer to ESRO Protocol as an RFC in the near future. Please let us know how we can help expedite the publication of ESRO as an Information RFC. Thank you in advance. Regards, - -- Mohsen Banan Neda Communications, Inc. tel: +1-206-644-8026 17005 S.E. 31st Place fax: +1-206-562-9591 Bellevue, Wa 98008 E-Mail: mohsen@neda.com U.S.A. URL: http://www.neda.com/ ------------------------------ From: rfc-ed@ISI.EDU (RFC Editor) To: mohsen@rostam.neda.com Cc: rfc-ed@ISI.EDU Subject: Re: Status of publication of ESRO Protocol as an Informational RFC Date: Thu, 3 Apr 1997 15:57:01 -0800 Message-Id: <199704032357.AA17887@zephyr.isi.edu> Moshen-- The IESG requested that your document not be published at this time. They will be in contact with you after their meeting this coming week in Memphis. Sincerely, Mary Kennedy - USC/ISI Request for Comments Documents ------------------------------ From: Mohsen Banan <mohsen@rostam.neda.com> To: rfc-ed@ISI.EDU (RFC Editor) Cc: mohsen@rostam.neda.com, Jia-Bing Cheng <JBCheng@attws-hq1.nwest.attws.com>, jim.grams@attws.com, Pean Lim-Neda <pean@rostam.neda.com> Subject: Re: Status of publication of ESRO Protocol as an Informational RFC Date: Thu, 3 Apr 1997 17:00:30 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199704040100.RAA07041@jamshid.neda.com> >>>>> On Thu, 3 Apr 1997 15:57:01 -0800, rfc-ed@ISI.EDU (RFC Editor) said: RFC-Editor> Moshen-- RFC-Editor> The IESG requested that your document not be published at this time. RFC-Editor> They will be in contact with you after their meeting this coming week RFC-Editor> in Memphis. RFC-Editor> Sincerely, RFC-Editor> Mary Kennedy - USC/ISI RFC-Editor> Request for Comments Documents Can you please let us know generally what the reason for the delay is? That document has been in the draft directory for more than 60 days and we have heard no comments about it. Can you tell us who the IESG contact person is for this Informational RFC? Non of the ESRO authors were planning to participate in the Memphis IETF. But, may be we can participate in the IESG meeting and address relevant questions and issues over the phone. Of course, I'll be happy to respond to questions/comments through email as well. Based on my understanding of the process of Informational RFC publication (RFC-2026 Sections 4.2.2 & 4.2.3), IESG's review relates to conflicts of the domain of the document with work that is being done or is expected to be done, within the IETF community. Is there a conflict? Sincerely, - -- Mohsen Banan Neda Communications, Inc. tel: +1-206-644-8026 17005 S.E. 31st Place fax: +1-206-562-9591 Bellevue, Wa 98008 E-Mail: mohsen@neda.com U.S.A. URL: http://www.neda.com/ ------- end -------
- Prev by Date: Re: Status of publication of ESRO Protocol as an Informational RFC
- Next by Date: Re: Unexpected and Unreasonable delays in processing of Informational RFC (ESRO Protocol)
- Prev by thread: Re: Status of publication of ESRO Protocol as an Informational RFC
- Next by thread: Re: Unexpected and Unreasonable delays in processing of Informational RFC (ESRO Protocol)
- Index(es):